Work

Occupational Therapy Practitioners’ Perceptions of the Utilization of Three-Dimensional Printing in Upper Extremity Practice

Public Deposited

MLA citation style (9th ed.)

Baughman, Julie M, et al. Occupational Therapy Practitioners’ Perceptions of the Utilization of Three-dimensional Printing In Upper Extremity Practice. DeCleene Huber, Kate E., Peterson, Erin K..University of Indianapolis. 2018. uindy.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/a57e7a06-cea3-45aa-b768-8286ab5b5c51?locale=en.

APA citation style (7th ed.)

B. J. M, D. Haley, H. K. A, H. Jordan, & F. Lexi. (2018). Occupational Therapy Practitioners’ Perceptions of the Utilization of Three-Dimensional Printing in Upper Extremity Practice. https://uindy.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/a57e7a06-cea3-45aa-b768-8286ab5b5c51?locale=en

Chicago citation style (CMOS 17, author-date)

Baughman, Julie M., Danhof, Haley, Harper, Kelsie A., Hillenburg, Jordan, and Ferguson, Lexi. Occupational Therapy Practitioners’ Perceptions of the Utilization of Three-Dimensional Printing In Upper Extremity Practice. University of Indianapolis. 2018. https://uindy.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/a57e7a06-cea3-45aa-b768-8286ab5b5c51?locale=en.

Note: These citations are programmatically generated and may be incomplete.

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology is thought to enhance developments in the medical field by printing products for the use of patients and health care providers. Researchers have investigated the use and impact of 3D printing technology in different health care professions; however, research regarding its use in occupational therapy practice, specifically upper extremity rehabilitation, is in early stages. Additionally, the perceptions occupational therapy providers have concerning the use of 3D printing in practice are currently unknown. In this study, investigators explored the perceptions and applications of 3D printing technology among occupational therapy practitioners through an online survey. Researchers received 268 completed surveys from participants who met inclusion criteria and analyzed responses using a mixed methods approach. Only seven participants (2.61%) reported using a 3D printer in their practice to print items such as prosthetics, orthotics, educational tools and models, and assistive devices. Non-users of the technology varied in their opinions regarding the potential impact 3D printing technology would have on their clinical practice. Furthermore, three themes emerged as barriers to implementing 3D printing into practice: 1.) lack of knowledge, 2.) clinician apprehension, and 3.) limited resources. The authors suggest there is a need for more research and provider education to improve understanding of 3D printing technology and its role in occupational therapy and upper extremity rehabilitation.

Creator
Contributors
Publisher
Language
Identifier
Keyword
Date created
Resource type
Source
  • S52

Rights statement

Relations

Items